A question we often get asked by patients with CIRS is: “Should I go on the keto diet??”

 

Many patients, in their willingness to do whatever it takes to improve their health are eager to consider restrictive diets such as the keto diet. I’m not against the keto diet by any means, but like all diets, don’t believe in one diet fits all and the keto diet is no exception. Like many diets, some thrive following a certain dietary structure and macronutrient profile, and some struggle and never see the results they’re hoping for. For many patients with CIRS, their aim is not losing weight, but improving their energy levels and mental focus. With so many anecdotes flying around cyberspace expounding on the drastic weight loss and “keto-high” noted by proponents of the keto diet, surely it MUST be ideal for one fighting CIRS, right? Not always.

 

Though the keto diet may be beneficial for some patients dealing with CIRS, there are nuanced cases in which a ketogenic diet may actually have the opposite effect – less energy and more pronounced fatigue. Get ready for a gross oversimplification! But hopefully you get the idea…

 

A major question in cellular metabolism is – What happens to pyruvate? Does it go where we want – be converted to Acetyl-CoA then into the mitochondria and through the electron transport chain where it provides the greatest per molecule yield of ATP? Or is it shunted towards making lactate (lactic acid – the stuff that makes you sore after a good workout)?

Is the Ketogenic Diet Optimal for CIRS patients?
Adapted from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12915-019-0678-9/figures/1

Many patients with CIRS struggle with impairment of their glucose metabolism, called molecular hypometabolism (MHM)1. Let’s consider what many with CIRS and MHM struggle with: inefficient glucose metabolism by upregulated aerobic glycolysis (worsened by “closed” voltage dependent anion channels in the mitochondrial membrane) and increased lactic acid production by redirection of pyruvate. Many also suffer from tissue level hypoxemia due to capillary hypoperfusion.

 

In the keto diet, the body’s primary fuel are fatty acids, which are processed through a pathway called The Randle cycle. The Randle cycle technically decreases glucose utilization in favor of fat breakdown (fatty acid oxidation)2. There are three main considerations to the Randle cycle with respect to how this might impact a CIRS patient with MHM:

 

1. Suppressing glucose metabolism by directing glucose to be stored as glycogen (a glucose storage molecule)
2. Requiring a greater amount of oxygen than is available, and
3. Preventing pyruvate from being converted into acetyl-CoA, thus backing up the system and causing pyruvate to be catabolized into lactate

Is the Ketogenic Diet Optimal for CIRS patients?
Mechanism of inhibition of glucose utilization by fatty acid oxidation. The extent of inhibition is graded and most severe at the level of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and less severe at the level of 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase (PFK) and glucose uptake. PDH inhibition is caused by acetyl-CoA and NADH accumulation resulting from fatty acid oxidation, whereas PFK inhbition results from citrate accumulation in the cytosol. The mechanism of inhibition of glucose uptake is not clear. These effects reroute glucose toward glycogen synthesis and pyruvate to anaplerosis and/or gluconeogenesis. See text for further details. CYTO, cytosol; MITO, mitochondria; GLUT4, glucose transporter 4; HK, hexokinase; Glc-6-P, glucose 6-phosphate; Fru-6-P, fructose 6-phosphate; CPT I, carnitine palmitoyltransferase I; β-ox, β-oxidation.2

The Randle cycle is very greedy for oxygen, (soooo not ideal for someone who struggles with capillary hypoperfusion and decreased oxygen delivery to the tissues already). Further, accumulation of citric acid (citrate), part of the Krebs cycle (now being driven by fat, not sugar) suppresses phosphofructokinase (PFK-1), increasing glucose-6-phosphate (Glc-6-P), shunting the glycolysis pathway towards glycogen storage. This shunting of available glucose to glycogen is making the already inefficient aerobic glycolysis even less effective at energy production as it’s stealing its fuel – so the MHM patient could feel even more exhausted. Think of it like someone giving you money to go buy food, but someone else coming along and forcing you to put that money in the bank, while you starve. This shouldn’t be the end of the world, as the patient transitions to a more ketone based metabolic system EXCEPT, the Acetyl-CoA from fatty acid oxidation further blocks pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), preventing pyruvate from being converted into Acetyl-CoA, and thus shunting over to the lactic acid via NADH. Add into this, blocked VDAC channels due to inflammation induced reduction of translocases, external biotoxins, etc., and you have multiple influences pushing pyruvate to lactic acid. This will, in turn, even worsen the surrounding extracellular acidity. If you have IRS2 upregulation (a common finding in CIRS patients), you will see an even greater influx of glucose, feeding into this now harmful metabolic pathway, inducing even more acidemia. Not ideal.

 

Note: A major confounder to this hypothesis is that some of the channels used to get fatty acids into the mitochondria (like CPT-1) actually are associated with VDAC3 and might also be downregulated in those with certain types of CIRS, and thus fatty acids might be a poor source of fuel in that they can never even enter into these metabolic pathways at all. More research is needed along these lines.

 

If the keto diet was maintained long term in an individual suffering with CIRS and MHM and upregulated IRS2, there is a real possibility of increased vascular disease, increased pulmonary hypertension, poor oxygen delivery, and increased heart strain (the heart will be starving and bathing its cells in lactic acid). Certainly, more direct research is needed along these lines. To reiterate a point made early in this post – these associations are my hypothesis, not yet proven. That said, at this point, I do not really see the potential benefits of the keto diet outweighing the potential risks, in one suffering with CIRS.


References:

Hue, L., & Taegtmeyer, H. (2009). The Randle cycle revisited: A new head for an old hat. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 29(3), 578-591. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00093.2009

 

Schlaepfer, I.R., & Molishree, J. (2020). CPT1A-mediated fat oxidation, mechanisms, and therapeutic potential, Endocrinology, 161(2). DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqz046

 

Shoemaker, Ritchie. (2020) Metabolism, molecular hypometabolism and inflammation: Complications of proliferative physiology include metabolic acidosis, pulmonary hypertension, T reg cell deficiency, insulin resistance and neuronal injury. Retrieved from Open Access Text (OAT). DOI: 10.15761/TDM.1000118


Images retrieved from:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12915-019-0678-9/figures/1


Author:

Dr. Daniel Ruttle, MD

In the evidence-based research article linked below, Drs. Shoemaker, McMahon, Heyman, Lark, van der Westhuizen, and Ryan use lessons from CIRS research to analyze potential treatment for post-COVID symptoms. Patients living with COVID long-haul symptoms may appreciate taking a look at the research.

 

Click on the title below to read the full research article:

“Treatable metabolic and inflammatory abnormalities in Post COVID Syndrome (PCS) define the transcriptomic basis for persistent symptoms: Lessons from CIRS”

 

If you have questions about the article and CIRS, email us at [email protected]

 

In the evidence-based research article linked below, Drs. Shoemaker, Neil, Heyman, van der Westhuizen, McMahon, and Lark focus on newer molecular methods that offer insights into health risk assessments. If you live or work in a Water-Damaged Building (WDB), diving deep into this research may be of interest to you.

 

Click on the title below to read the full research article:

“Newer Molecular Methods Bring New Insights into Human- And Building- Health Risk Assessments from Water-Damaged Buildings”

 

If you have questions about the article and CIRS, email us at [email protected]

To understand why we would run certain lab tests, it is important to understand how a person acquires CIRS. First, a genetically susceptible person (more on this later) is exposed to a biotoxin source. The crux of CIRS illness is dysregulated communication between the two arms of the immune system -the innate and adaptive immune system. Normally the innate immune system would flag the biotoxin and present it to the adaptive immune system that would get rid of it and create an antibody towards it for subsequent exposures.

 

However, in CIRS, the adaptive immune system doesn’t recognize the biotoxins the innate immune system is flagging, and this allows the biotoxins to stay in the body creating uncontrolled inflammation that never stops. The ongoing absence of protective antibodies to biotoxins is what causes CIRS. We can measure the immune response to this inflammation through “proteomics” which will be abnormal in almost every CIRS patient. Below are the proteomic labs we most often run at Linden & Arc Vitality Institute: 

 

HLA:

HLA is the biggie. HLA stands for Human Leukocyte Antigen, and these are a set of genes on chromosome 6 that encode proteins that regulate the immune system. HLA lets us know if you are genetically susceptible to inflammation provoked by biotoxins. And not everyone is! Approximately 25% of the population will be susceptible to CIRS. This is the core of why some people get sick, and others don’t – the predisposition is built into the DNA.

 

MSH:

MSH is a hormone made in the pituitary gland in the brain. MSH is the master regulator as it plays an important role in regulating hormones, inflammation, and defence against pathogens. MSH deficiency in CIRS patients is common and can lead to fatigue, chronic pain, insomnia and non-restorative sleep from disrupted circadian rhythms, increased intestinal permeability (IBS like symptoms), sexual dysfunction, and other hormonal irregularities.

 

MARCONS:

Lowered MSH also allows for MARCONS to colonize deep in the nasal sinuses. MARCONS thrives in the biofilm of your nasal mucous membranes and secrete neurotoxic substances into the central nervous system (brain) and worsens the clinical symptoms.

 

TGF beta-1:

TGF beta-1 may be the single most important lab finding. It is pleiotropic meaning it can either suppress or induce inflammation. It plays a key role in controlling the body’s response to biotoxin exposure by regulating immune pathways. Elevated TGF beta-1 indicates there is an overactive immune response occurring, and inflammation has become the dominant response.

 

MMP9:

This is an enzyme that allows inflammatory compounds to leave the blood stream and enter organs and tissues.  This causes widespread inflammation, especially in the lungs, brain, muscles, joints, and nerves.

 

C4a:

This is an inflammatory marker specific to the innate immune system – the first line of defense to immune threats. C4a is part of that sequence of events that occurs when a pathogen sparks the innate immune system response. High levels of C4a are often seen in CIRS and contributes to shortness of breath, fatigue, brain fog, and dysfunction in thinking and memory.

 

VEGF:

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor is a protein that stimulates the growth of new blood vessels to increase oxygen supply to tissues when circulation is reduced. In CIRS, VEGF is usually low from inflammatory cytokines, and this leads to poor oxygen delivery to muscles. Reduced oxygen leads to cramping and fatigue especially occurring after exercise or physical activity.

 

ACTH/ CORTISOL:

ACTH is a hormone released by the pituitary gland in the brain that tells your adrenals -little hat shaped glands on top of your kidneys – to produce cortisol. ACTH and cortisol are in a delicately balanced feedback system. Cortisol is the steroid hormone responsible for the stress response also known as “fight or flight”.  Cortisol has many other roles including blood sugar balance, immune regulation, as well as response to physical/emotional stress. Chronic stress from ongoing inflammation in prolonged illness causes cortisol production to become dysregulated and this may appear as an inability to handle stress, sleep disturbances, blood sugar imbalances (dizziness, low blood sugar), and fatigue.

 

ADH/ OSMOLALITY:

Anti-diuretic hormone is made in the hypothalamus in the brain and regulates the body’s ability to hold water. Osmolality is the concentration of chemical solutes (sodium, potassium, calcium) that are found in the serum or liquid part of the blood. In CIRS, there is a lack of regulation of the balance of salt and water, and this happens when ADH is low (or too high) and osmolarity is too high (or too low). This will cause dehydration headaches (even migraines), excessive thirst, and frequent urination. With sodium levels increasing in the blood, sweat will also have additional salt in it and this can create increased susceptibility to electric static shocks. This is frequently seen as shocking light switches or seeing blue sparks when you rub your feet against the sheets when in bed. 

 

There is a lot to decipher in complex illnesses like CIRS. At Linden & Arc Vitality Institute, we can help you figure out your diagnosis and determine the best courses of action based on your health needs and case. To book an appointment or for more information, contact [email protected].

 

References

Berndtson, K., McMahon, S., Ackerley, M., Rapaport, S., Gupta, S., & Shoemaker, R.C., (2008). Medically sound investigation and remediation of water-damaged buildings in cases of CIRS-WDB. Retrieved from https://www.survivingmold.com/MEDICAL_CONSENSUS_STATEMENT_10_30_15.PDF

 

Shoemaker, R.C. (2010). Surviving mold: Life in the era of dangerous buildings. Otter Bay Books.

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Andrew, H., Annalaura, M., Ryan, J. (2017). Inflammation induced chronic fatiguing illnesses: A steady march towards understanding mechanisms and identifying new biomarkers and therapies. Internal Medicine Review (3)11, 1-29. 

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Johnson, K., Lysander, J., Berry, Y., Dooley, M., Ryan, J., & McMahon, S. (2018). Diagnostic process for CIRS: A consensus statement report of the Consensus Committee of Surviving Mold. Internal Medicine Review, 4(5), 1-47.

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Mark, L., McMahon, S., Thrasher, J., Grimes, C. (2010). Research Committee Report on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory response syndrome caused by exposure to the interior environment of water-damaged buildings. Policyholders of America. Retrieved from https://www.survivingmold.com/docs/POA_MOLD_7_27_10_final.pdf

 

Shoemaker, R.C., McMahon, S., & Heyman, A. (2020). The art and science of CIRS medicine. Ebook retrieved from https://www.survivingmold.com/store1/books/art-and-science-of-cirs 

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Neil, V., Heyman, A., van der Westhuizen, M., McMahon, S., & Lark, D. (2001). Newer molecular methods bring new insights into human- and building- health risk assessments from water-damaged buildings: Defining exposure and reactivity, the two sides of causation of CIRS-WDB illness. Medical Research Archives (9)3, 1-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v9i3.2358   

 

For more information, go to: https://www.survivingmold.com

 

Author:

Dr. Ayla Lester, ND

Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS) describes a group of symptoms and specific lab findings associated with biotoxin exposure in genetically susceptible individuals. When your doctor suspects you have CIRS, this is based initially on an eye test (Visual Contrast Sensitivity or VSC) and a set of specific symptoms.

 

The set of specific symptoms are outlined in something called the “CIRS Symptom Cluster Questionnaire” that is usually done on intake and during the first visit – it is that important!  Alongside a skilled medical history, this questionnaire statistically separates CIRS from all other diseases. No other illness to date will have a finding of 8/13 clusters of symptoms present! The likelihood of having a CIRS illness with a score of 8/13 or higher, is 95%!

 

The CIRS Symptom Cluster Questionnaire:

If one symptom or all symptoms are checked off in a category, this counts for one point for the category.

  1. Fatigue, weakness
  2. Headaches
  3. Joint aches, muscle aches, muscle cramps
  4. Unusual sharp, claw, electrical pain or ice pick pain
  5. Light sensitivity, eye redness, blurring of vision, tearing
  6. Shortness of breath, cough, sinus congestion or nasal drainage
  7. Abdominal tenderness or pain, secretory diarrhea
  8. Joint pain, morning stiffness
  9. Executive function difficulty, memory difficulty, poor concentration, difficulty with finding words, confusion, disorientation, difficulty assimilating new knowledge
  10. Mood changes; appetite swings, sweats, poor regulation of temperature
  11. Excessive thirst, frequent urination, static electric shocks
  12. Numbness, tingling, taste disturbance (metallic taste) 
  13. Vertigo, tremor, unusual skin sensations

CIRS

When we add a failed VCS test to a positive Symptom Cluster Questionnaire (8/13 or greater), the likelihood that we are dealing with a CIRS illness is 98.5%. The VCS test tells us if there are visual deficits from biotoxin exposure. Biotoxins are a dangerous mix of chemicals, mold, bacteria, and inflammation provoking compounds in water damaged buildings.

 

Additionally, CIRS can have other triggers such as tick bites (with Lyme disease), brown recluse spider bites, and ingestion of contaminated reef fish. Biotoxins stir up inflammation by provoking immune cells to release cytokines that reduce blood flow to the retina and the optic nerve. The retina is the part of the eyes that enables vision, and the optic nerve is the nerve that carries impulses from the retina to the brain for visual information to be interpreted. With decreased blood flow to these areas, the ability to discriminate contrast is reduced. Contrast is the ability to see an edge/detect a visual pattern. 92% of CIRS patients will have a difficult time distinguishing contrast and will fail the VCS test.

 

There are additional tests that are important to run not only to confirm the diagnosis of CIRS but also for tracking the success of treatments. Clinically, we want you to be symptom free and living your best life, and, from a pathology perspective, we want certain lab markers – proteomics, GENIE, and NeuroQuant- to come back into a normal range. When these lab markers are dysregulated, the organs that get injured from uncontrolled inflammation are the brain, heart, and lungs.

 

At Linden & Arc Vitality Institute, we can help you figure out your diagnosis and determine the best courses of action based on your health needs and case. To book an appointment or for more information, contact [email protected].

 

References

Berndtson, K., McMahon, S., Ackerley, M., Rapaport, S., Gupta, S., & Shoemaker, R.C., (2008). Medically sound investigation and remediation of water-damaged buildings in cases of CIRS-WDB. Retrieved from https://www.survivingmold.com/MEDICAL_CONSENSUS_STATEMENT_10_30_15.PDF

 

Shoemaker, R.C. (2010). Surviving mold: Life in the era of dangerous buildings. Otter Bay Books.

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Andrew, H., Annalaura, M., Ryan, J. (2017). Inflammation induced chronic fatiguing illnesses: A steady march towards understanding mechanisms and identifying new biomarkers and therapies. Internal Medicine Review (3)11, 1-29. 

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Johnson, K., Lysander, J., Berry, Y., Dooley, M., Ryan, J., & McMahon, S. (2018). Diagnostic process for CIRS: A consensus statement report of the Consensus Committee of Surviving Mold. Internal Medicine Review, 4(5), 1-47.

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Mark, L., McMahon, S., Thrasher, J., Grimes, C. (2010). Research Committee Report on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory response syndrome caused by exposure to the interior environment of water-damaged buildings. Policyholders of America. Retrieved from https://www.survivingmold.com/docs/POA_MOLD_7_27_10_final.pdf

 

Shoemaker, R.C., McMahon, S., & Heyman, A. (2020). The art and science of CIRS medicine. Ebook retrieved from https://www.survivingmold.com/store1/books/art-and-science-of-cirs 

 

Shoemaker, R.C., Neil, V., Heyman, A., van der Westhuizen, M., McMahon, S., & Lark, D. (2001). Newer molecular methods bring new insights into human- and building- health risk assessments from water-damaged buildings: Defining exposure and reactivity, the two sides of causation of CIRS-WDB illness. Medical Research Archives (9)3, 1-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v9i3.2358   

 

For more information, go to: https://www.survivingmold.com

 

Author:

Dr. Ayla Lester, ND

This video is a presentation at a CIRS conference – I Dream of GENIE Webinar — CIRSx: Joining the Mission in October 2021. Former physician at Linden & Arc Vitality institute, Dr. Michelle van der Westhuizen, was featured at the conference with Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker and CIRS Academy Faculty.

 

This is the abstract from the video presentation at CIRSx:”PTSD is a prevalent condition, although very underdiagnosed. We now have a transcriptomic (gene expression) marker, called FKBP5 to further assess PTSD and other chronic stressors. The upregulation of this gene tells us that a patient has an altered response to stress and likely limbic system dysregulation. This activated gene may lead to chronic disease and psychiatric conditions down the line. This presentation dives deep into FKBP5 – what is it, how does its activation disrupt our physiology, what illnesses may occur as a result. Also discussed are potential ways for us to manage this. Currently, this marker is only screened for in our CIRS patients, but has promising future applications in mental health and other illness.”

 

Below you can watch the full 30-minute presentation for the CIRSx Conference: